“Bromates”: pressing hard on Sunny

A message about climate change and renewable energy is at the heart of a new romantic comedy that hits theaters next month.

In “Bromates,” directed by Cort Crandall (“Old School”) with Josh Brenner (“Silicon Valley”) and Lil Rel Howery (“Exit”), starring lifelong friends Sid, a passionate solar salesman, and Jonesy, an eccentric, brave womanizer – he was dumped by his girlfriends, who live with them on the same day, and they decided to move in with each other. Through their misadventures, which eventually lead to a surprising encounter with rapper Snoop Dogg (played by himself), Sid excitedly tells everyone he meets—even the women he tries to flirt with—about the environmental benefits of solar energy , and for energy saving.

Get your first look at the film in this exclusive clip:

The inclusion of solar factoids was very intentional. The film is the brainchild of Chris Kemper, the CEO of a solar company Palmetto, who co-wrote the screenplay with Crandall. Kemper compared “Bromates” to “Don’t Look Up” as another example of an entertaining comedy film with an environmental message at its core.

“You can take these narratives and make them more mainstream, even though it’s subtle, it doesn’t have to be in your face,” Kemper said. “So it’s more of a dialogue. Like, after the movie, you talk about it with your friends, stuff like that.”

The film will be released in US theaters on October 7.


Reducing Ethereum’s carbon footprint by 99.992 percent

This week, the Ethereum blockchain underwent a major software update experts have compared to converting a gas-powered vehicle to an electric vehicle while the vehicle is in motion. A found a report by the Crypto Carbon Rating Institute that the update reduced the electricity consumption of the blockchain that supports the second largest cryptocurrency, ether, by 99.988 percent and its carbon footprint by 99.992 percent.

On Thursday, the long-awaited Ethereum “to merge” is known to have shifted the foundation of blockchain without disrupting investment after almost two years of preparation. The merger changed the way transactions are verified on this cryptocurrency model, which unlike traditional currency systems is not backed by a centralized institution.

The basics of the merger are complicated, but here’s the gist of what happened: The Ethereum blockchain used to rely on “proof of work“A security method in which power-intensive cryptocurrency mining computers solve complex equations to verify transactions in exchange for more cryptocurrency, to “proof of fate,” in which significant investors confirm transactions by putting up a portion of their investment as collateral to keep them honest when audited.

The move to “proof of stake” has long been seen as the most significant way to reduce the carbon footprint of the crypto industry. White House report According to estimates this month, crypto activity in the United States results in about 25 to 50 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year, which is similar to the amount of diesel fuel used on the nation’s railroads.

“Proof of work is wasteful by design,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at the Environmental Working Group. “And the merger shows that changing the code from proof of work to proof of stake is possible.”

Now that Ethereum has made this shift, Bitcoin is following suit. According to a White House report, Bitcoin accounts for about two-thirds of the electricity used by the crypto industry worldwide. Environmental Working Group, Greenpeace and other organizations started a campaign calling on technology and financial leaders who have large investments in bitcoin and are believed to have influence in the bitcoin community to convert the blockchain to proof-of-stake.

But if Bitcoin doesn’t make changes, Faber said the government should step in and create energy efficiency standards for the crypto industry. The Biden administration appears poised to do so based on its recommendations in this month’s report.

“This is an important moment that should make the Bitcoin community realize that the financial future of this asset depends on changing this code,” Faber said. “Sane people are not going to invest in financial security that will create more and more climate pollution.”


Listening to young people about the climate

For the past few years, youth have been at the center of climate advocacy as the population that will be living in 2050 and beyond when the worst effects of climate change begin to occur if decisive action is not taken now. Inspired by young activists, a community radio climate podcast gave its microphones to local eighth graders.

Two journalists from Higher ground, a podcast from WSHU, spent the spring with an after-school science education program in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Many of these students learned about climate change in school and understood what was happening to the planet as a whole, said co-host J. D. Allen, WSHU Reporter. While the students were familiar with Greta Thunberg and other activists who blamed politicians and corporations for their inaction, Allen said many were unaware of how climate change was manifesting itself in their own backyards.

Allen and his co-host, Sabrina Garrone, taught the children how to use recording equipment and encouraged them to find the effects of climate change in their area. Funded by the Joan Gantz Cooney Center and Sesame Workshop, the five-episode podcast offers a glimpse into the minds of teenagers as they search for these effects and consider why they happen. Not only did the students find problems, Allen said, but they started brainstorming solutions.

“I was blown out of the water. They really really did,” he said. He recalled one young student who began a class wondering why a shade tree in his yard had been cut down, and after just a few weeks, the student was figuring out how to plant trees in Bridgeport to increase shade and reduce the effects of extreme heat.

“As we listen to young people and their ideas and present them to policymakers,” Allen said, “I hope that podcast listeners will ask themselves, ‘Well, what ideas might come from the youth in my community?’ »


Advocates of climate change and “false social reality”

While about two-thirds of Americans support climate policy, a majority of people in the country believe that the percentage of people who are climate aware is just over one-third of the population.

Researchers made such conclusions from a survey of more than 6,000 Americans and published their findings last month in the journal Nature Communications. Americans of all ages, education levels and political groups vastly underestimated public concern about climate change and support for climate policy in what researchers call a shared sense of “false social reality.”

“Even though there are twice as many supporters as opponents, people think the opposite is true,” said study author Greg Sparkman, an assistant professor at Boston College. “And so many Americans feel alone in their concern about climate change, or may feel alone in thinking that they want to take action on this issue, but other people shouldn’t.”

Sparkman said he was surprised by how big the gap was. “People weren’t just a little bit, but they were so much that to completely flip the perception of the supermajority of Americans to just a minority was mind-boggling to us.”

More research is needed to find out exactly why Americans are so divided in their perceptions of support for climate policy, Sparkman said, but the divide could lead people to abandon or moderate their views on climate policy if they believe other people don’t care about change climate. “If I’m worried about climate change but I don’t think others are, if I have that thought, I’m more likely to think that maybe I’m overreacting, maybe it’s not that big of a problem.” — Sparkman said.

He hopes the climate policies in the Inflation Reduction Act, along with continued public opinion polling about Americans’ views on climate change, will help break this false social reality.

“These signals will hopefully come together and help dispel the myth that Americans aren’t worried about climate change,” Sparkman said. “Hopefully, it can create a kind of better narrative that shows that the United States is a nation of people who want ambitious climate policy.”

Previous articleVW Multivan Edition visits the dark side, gets the Goodnight package with rollaway bed
Next articleHow the stage of the Acropolis stadium became a training ground for the Greek police – DirtFish